When die hypothesis?
Last year someone at work asked me if I was okay with that Maradona was the coach.
I replied that as a rule it seems better to analyze the CV or background before giving someone a responsibility. So for me Maradona had few and poor record as coach and his appointment was not appropriate.
Of course most of those around me said it was good that was the "Diego" gave me little reason or none.
Always bet on the training of people.
in all fields of life.
When I see a student who disapproves of a review I see a system that fails. When I saw a bunch of guys cutting a street because they had no gas and then hit a city, I see where the failure of teachers. They failed because they failed to make students see that "might is right of the beasts." Without rationality, the world would never have solved many problems. Returning to
theme of football then I would be a new teaching or not.
all depends on the selected results.
If Maradona achieved better performance than other technicians then one must assume, at least in soccer, team management to deal with local or foreign does not experience. There will therefore be necessary to make the technical course nor previous experience. Other factors are more important. Perhaps the motivation that gives the technician or the individual characteristics of the players.
Could we extend the result of football to teach in colleges and universities?
Who can teach better? Anyone
with experience or just the desire to reach?
mention the subject of football because it is a social fact that everyone can see. There are no secret meetings or private meetings of members. Is everything in sight. The triumphs, mistakes and defeats. There are no drafts which are arranged thousand times until they are "politically correct."
is to be on the trapeze without a net.
